Democrats call for first ban on semi-automatic weapons in 20 years
WASHINGTON (AP) — House Democrats began moving forward on Wednesday with legislation that would ban certain semi-automatic weapons as they considered their most ambitious response yet to the series of mass shootings by this summer.
Democrats hope the 100-page bill passing through the Judiciary Committee will pass the House before the August recess. But that’s far from assured, with moderates in the party, especially those from swinging politically divided districts, wary of a blanket gun control vote ahead of November’s midterm elections. – especially when the bill is unlikely to become law due to opposition. in the Senate.
The renewed push for an assault weapons ban comes nearly two decades after Congress allowed similar restrictions to expire. The original ban was passed in 1994, led by the then senator. Joe Biden, and banned certain semi-automatic weapons and high-capacity magazines, although he exempted about 1.5 million of these weapons and 25 million that were already American-owned.
LOOK: Gun violence in America shows no signs of abating after new wave of mass shootings
In the nearly three decades since, mass shootings have become commonplace in the United States, with semi-automatic weapons often used in attacks on schools, workplaces, public spaces, stores , churches and other gathering places.
“The sole purpose of an assault weapon is to kill people effectively,” Nadler, D-NY., said Wednesday as the committee took action. “It’s time to protect our communities and ban them again.”
Committee Democrats aired haunting audio from the 2018 shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida, in which 17 people were killed and 17 injured. Dozens of rapid gunfire could be heard in just 1 minute and 18 seconds, along with the cries of distress from those trying to escape.
“There are more guns than people in this country, more mass killings than days in the year. This is a uniquely American problem, and assault weapons only amplify the epidemic,” said the bill’s sponsor, Rep. David Cicilline, DR.I., at the end of the audio. .
Wednesday’s hearing also comes in the wake of a July 4 mass shooting at a parade in Highland, Illinois, and back-to-back mass shootings in Buffalo, New York and Uvalde, Texas.
The carnage in South Texas killed 19 school-aged children, some of whose bodies were unidentifiable to their parents. Under pressure to act, Congress last month passed the largest gun violence measure in decades. It included background checks on gun buyers between the ages of 18 and 21 as well as the allocation of public funds to enact local “red flag” laws.
But the bill fell far short of the measures Biden and Democrats say are needed to curb the epidemic of gun violence in the country. Many say the killings won’t stop until tougher gun controls are enacted.
“We pay for these weapons of war on our streets with the blood of our children sitting in our schools,” said Rep. Lucy McBath, D-Ga., whose 17-year-old son was fatally shot at a gas station . in 2012, said at the hearing.
“We’re reasonable people and it’s a reasonable effort,” added Rep. Sheila Jackson-Lee, D-Texas. “I look forward to continuing the debate and saying enough is enough. We love our children. I demand relief.
READ MORE: Indiana mall shooting kills 4, including shooter, police say
Republicans on the committee opposed the proposal, calling it an attack on Second Amendment rights.
“Democrats know this legislation won’t reduce violent crime or the likelihood of mass shootings, but they are obsessed with attacking the Second Amendment freedoms of law-abiding Americans,” said Rep. Jim Jordan, the most big republican of the committee. “For more than 30 years, Democrats have waged a propaganda campaign to trick people into believing that ‘assault weapons’ are a specific class of gun that no one needs.”
Cicilline pushed back, saying Second Amendment protection is not without limits. He said the Democratic proposal focuses on assault rifles, which are not what the majority of law-abiding Americans buy and own.
“Dangerous military weapons that were created to fight on the battlefield and slaughter enemies have no place in the neighborhoods, schools and cinemas where we live,” he added.
Associated Press writer Kevin Freking contributed to this report.